Using Structured Products and Interval Funds as a Bond Replacement for Income Focused Clients

Word count: 1,724
Time to read: 7 minutes

Income focused investors face a quiet frustration. Traditional bonds, which once provided steady cash flow and relative safety, now deliver yields in the 4 to 5 percent range. Investment grade corporate bonds yield around 3.85 to 4.59 percent depending on credit quality. High yield bonds hover near 7 percent. For retirees, conservative investors, and clients saving for near term goals, these returns feel inadequate when inflation runs 3 to 4 percent and the cost of living continues rising. The standard response is to reach for lower credit quality or longer duration, both of which add risk without proportional return. A growing alternative exists in the form of FDIC insured structured notes and principal protected market linked certificates of deposit. These instruments combine the safety of bank deposits with access to higher coupons and market linked returns, offering a compelling bond replacement for clients who can tolerate holding their investment to maturity and who understand the tradeoffs between customization and complexity. For young professionals and entrepreneurs, as well as retirees in Austin, seeking income, structured notes provide a legitimate path to enhanced yields while preserving capital.​​

Why Traditional Bond Yields Are Failing Income Investors

The arithmetic of bonds has changed. A 10 year Treasury currently yields around 4.13 percent, while high quality corporate bonds yield 3.85 to 4.59 percent depending on credit rating. After federal income taxes at 24 percent for moderate to high earners, that becomes 3.14 percent net on Treasuries or 2.93 to 3.49 percent on corporates. State income taxes further reduce after tax returns. In high tax states like California or New York, combined federal and state rates exceed 50 percent on ordinary income, leaving after tax yields below 2 percent in many cases. Adjusted for inflation running 3 to 4 percent annually, real returns turn negative.​

The problem extends beyond yields. Bond prices decline when interest rates rise, creating mark to market losses for anyone who needs to sell before maturity. Duration risk on intermediate term bonds averaging six years means a one percent rise in yields causes roughly 6 percent decline in price. Investors holding ten year bonds face even steeper drawdowns. The Fed has signaled likely cuts in 2025 and 2026, but the trajectory is uncertain. The risk premium on longer maturity bonds remains below historical averages and could rise further, keeping yields elevated or pushing them higher.​

For clients living on investment income, relying entirely on bonds creates a compounding problem. As bond prices fluctuate, a retiree taking distributions from a bond portfolio can inadvertently lock in losses by selling at inopportune times. Ladder strategies using bonds of varying maturities reduce this friction but require active management and do not solve the yield problem. High yield bonds address the return shortfall but introduce significant default risk and volatility that many conservative investors cannot tolerate. The traditional playbook is broken for income focused portfolios in a world of low yields and fiscal uncertainty.​

How FDIC Insured Structured Notes Work

FDIC insured structured notes, also called market linked CDs or structured CDs, combine two core components. The first is a bond element providing principal protection, typically structured as a zero coupon bond priced at a discount to face value and designed to mature with the note. The bond component ensures that if the investor holds the note to maturity, the initial principal is guaranteed to be returned, subject to the creditworthiness of the issuer. For FDIC insured products, that protection extends up to 250,000 dollars per depositor per bank, making the principal guarantee backed by federal insurance rather than relying solely on issuer credit risk.​

The second component is a derivative element, typically options or similar instruments, whose payoff is linked to an underlying asset or index. For income focused notes, the derivative component generates coupon payments that can be either fixed rates or contingent on the underlying asset remaining within a specified range. A typical income note might pay a 7 to 8 percent annual coupon, distributed monthly, as long as the underlying index does not fall below 70 percent of its initial level. If the index remains above that barrier throughout the holding period, the investor receives full principal plus all coupon payments at maturity.​

The construction process begins with the bank issuer determining the desired maturity, underlying asset or index, and protection level. The bank then issues the zero coupon bond component that will mature at face value on a specified date. Simultaneously, the bank purchases derivative contracts, such as options, to generate the coupon payoff. Fees embedded in the note price compensate the bank for structuring the investment and taking the risks inherent in the derivative position. The investor does not typically pay an explicit management fee as a separate charge, but instead receives a lower coupon or participation rate than the underlying index return would suggest, reflecting the bank's compensation.​

Minimum investments are typically as low as 1,000 dollars, making structured notes accessible to average investors rather than requiring accredited investor status. Maturity dates range from one to ten years or more, allowing investors to match the note's term to their investment time horizon. The terms are transparent and clearly defined in the offering document, with specific language describing what happens if the note is called, what triggers coupon payments, and what protection applies if the underlying asset performs poorly.​

Structured Notes as a Bond Replacement Strategy

Income focused structured notes directly replace the income generation function of traditional bonds while offering higher coupons. A 10 year Treasury yielding 4.13 percent and subject to ordinary income taxation leaves a high earner with roughly 3.14 percent after federal taxes. A principal protected income note yielding 7 percent with full principal protection at maturity provides a meaningful income advantage even accounting for taxation and issuer credit risk. The difference translates to significantly higher cash flow for a retiree living on distributions.​

The comparison to corporate bonds is similarly compelling. Investment grade corporate bonds yielding 3.85 to 4.59 percent offer only modestly higher yields than Treasuries while assuming issuer default risk. Structured notes with 7 to 8 percent coupons provide material additional income. Unlike high yield bonds, structured notes do not sacrifice principal protection to achieve those higher coupons. If held to maturity, the investor receives 100 percent of their initial principal regardless of how the underlying asset performs, provided the contingency conditions are met.​

Structurally, FDIC insured notes occupy a middle ground between CDs, which offer simplicity but low yields around 3.75 to 4.10 percent across various maturities, and complex structured products that introduce significant counterparty risk. A traditional CD from a bank in December 2025 yields 4.00 percent on one year terms and 3.90 percent on five year terms, guaranteed by FDIC insurance. A market linked CD or structured CD with the same FDIC insurance but contingent on an index not falling below a barrier could yield 7 to 8 percent. The tradeoff is accepting reduced income if the index triggers the downside barrier, but the probability of that occurring is manageable for indices with broad diversification.​

For clients in their 60s and 70s focused on capital preservation and income, a portfolio structured as 40 percent public bonds, 40 percent dividend paying equities and REITs, and 20 percent principal protected structured notes provides higher current income than traditional allocations, with defined downside protection on the structured note sleeve. The equity portion provides total return and inflation protection, the bonds provide ballast and liquidity, and the structured notes amplify income without introducing naked equity or credit risk.​

Key Risks and Tradeoffs

Investors must understand that FDIC insurance covers principal and guaranteed interest, but does not extend to contingent income payments. In a structured note that pays 7 percent monthly contingent on an index remaining above a barrier, the FDIC insurance covers the principal and any guaranteed minimum return, but not the 7 percent contingent coupon. If the issuing bank fails before maturity, the FDIC covers the principal investment up to 250,000 dollars, but the contingent income may not be fully recoverable. This distinction is critical and must be explained clearly to clients.​

Liquidity risk is substantial. Structured notes are not designed to be traded before maturity, and secondary markets may not exist or may offer only distressed pricing if an investor needs to sell early. Unlike bonds, which trade actively in secondary markets and can be sold relatively quickly, structured notes often have no liquid exit mechanism prior to maturity. Investors must be willing to hold until maturity or face potential losses if forced to liquidate. This makes structured notes inappropriate for investors who may need access to their capital within the holding period.​

Call features introduce additional complexity. Many structured notes allow the issuer to call the security at preset dates and prices, especially if the underlying asset performs strongly. If a note paying 7 percent annual income is called after two years because the underlying index doubled, the investor receives full principal plus accrued income, but loses the remaining years of 7 percent coupons. To mitigate this risk, clients can hold multiple notes rather than a single large position, so if one note is called, others continue paying their scheduled income.​

Contingency barriers create an implicit conditional nature. A note that pays 7 percent as long as the index stays above 70 percent of its initial value will stop paying coupons if the barrier is breached. The investor recovers principal at maturity, but foregoes the remaining income. During major market corrections, it is entirely possible that indices fall 30 percent or more, triggering the barrier on multiple notes simultaneously. Clients must understand this scenario and be comfortable with the risk that income could be interrupted during market stress.​

Taxation of structured notes differs from traditional bonds in ways that can surprise investors. Contingent income is typically treated as ordinary income for tax purposes, subject to federal and state income taxes. Worse, investors may face what is called phantom income, where taxable interest must be reported annually even though no cash is received until maturity. For a note issued at a discount to par value, the difference between purchase price and maturity value is treated as imputed interest and taxed annually as ordinary income, even though the investor does not receive the cash until the note matures. This creates a severe timing mismatch between tax obligations and cash receipts, requiring investors to set aside funds for tax payments or to have sufficient other income to cover the tax liability. Consultation with a tax professional is essential before investing.​

Conclusion

FDIC insured structured notes and principal protected market linked CDs offer income focused investors a legitimate alternative to traditional bonds when yields are depressed and credit risk is elevated. By combining full principal protection with potential coupons in the 7 to 8 percent range, structured notes provide meaningful income enhancement relative to bond yields in the 4 to 5 percent range, even after accounting for taxation and embedded fees. The cost of that enhancement is accepting illiquidity until maturity, understanding contingency barriers and the possibility of reduced income during market stress, and managing phantom income taxation with the help of tax professionals.​

For conservative investors and retirees in their 60s and 70s who have at least five to ten years before they will need to access their capital, allocating 10 to 20 percent of portfolio assets to a diversified ladder of principal protected structured notes can meaningfully improve cash flow while maintaining strong downside protection. For clients in Austin and beyond, structured notes represent a tool worth understanding and deploying thoughtfully for the right investor at the right time. The key is recognizing the tradeoffs, communicating them transparently, and ensuring the client's circumstances and goals justify the reduced liquidity and added complexity relative to traditional bond investments.​